Of late, there has been a lot of talk, nay, dare I say racer concern over
multiple car teams on the Pro level in a single eliminator. Recently,
the focus of this chatter has been Don and Tony Schumacher's U.S. Army-backed
fuel team, which according to some is rumored to be a four-car effort
in 2001.
Tony, the 1999 defending Winston Top Fuel champ, would be at the helm
of the No. 1 car and Melanie Troxel would put the No. 2 team car through
its paces. However, in addition to that, rumor persists that the team
will also field two Funny Cars in 2001. In addition, opponents of conglomerates
like this say that Schumacher's armada is raiding other teams for tuning
and driving talent.
For many less-funded racers that qualifies as bad news, the kind of
bad news that created such a furor earlier this year at the NHRA ATSCO
Nationals in Arizona where nine-time Winston Funny Car champ John Force
was contemplating a third Castrol GTX Funny Car.
Force and his teammate Tony Pedregon, who finished 1-2 in the Winston
standings in 1997 and 1999, were to be joined by NHRA Top Fuel and Funny
Car winner Tommy Johnson in a third "test car." The fears concerning
this union were familiar ones; namely that the number two or three driver
would sandbag against the boss and also act as a blocker against other
competitors, thus diluting the competition.
Force, of course, has always maintained that he would never have Tony
go in the tank for him if they met in eliminations (and he proved to
be a man of his word here), and that the only time he would even consider
it would be if Tony and he met in the final race of the final year for
the world title. Force joked that he would simply go over to Tony before
their race, fire him, make a single, claim the title, then re-hire him
right after that.
Force's relatively clean nontanking record aside, the racers would
have none of it and swung a decision that forced the world champ to
step away from the Johnson plan. Force just threw up his hands, said
to hell with it, that was that.
Insiders will recall that drag racing history is replete with two car
professional teams. In fact, the Schumachers would not be the first
team to field four nitro cars. At the 1970 NHRA Winternationals, Mickey
Thompson showed with four Funny Cars; three Mustangs (driven by Danny
Ongais, Mike Van Sant and Johnny Wright) and a Maverick driven by Arnie
Behling.
Thompson's team was never a factor in 1970 and, because they ran so
many match races 30 years ago, they showed up en masse (as far as I
know) just once or twice that season. Hardly the national-event threat
to win that a Force or a Schumacher juggernaut represents.
Obviously things are a lot different today. In Funny Car, there are
two Force cars, two WWF race cars, and two Worsham Racing cars that
generally qualify for an NHRA field. Six of a16-car field that usually
qualify and pretty much determine that the other teams are competing
for 10 spots. If the rumored Schumacher deal is realized in 2001, you
got half the field with four teams. The more the merrier? Don't bet
on it.
One other reason for being a little down on this, is that since there
is a 90-percent nitro rule and the cars have slowed, I think fans are
going to have to work harder on enthusiasm when they watch four or five
monoplies battle it out at reduced speed for event titles.
Sure, these multi-car team efforts go on in NASCAR and IRL and the
other roundy-round circuits, and the Jack Roushes and Roger Penskes
definitely win their fair share of the races.
The thing that is different, though, is that a two-car (or more) team
gets swallowed up a lot easier in a race that starts more than two to
nearly three dozen cars. Not so in drag racing.
Not only that, but there are guys like Connie Kalitta in Top Fuel who
has the wherewithall to run more than one car (and he does have a spare
car set up for son, Scott), and the same applies to Kenny Bernstein.
Keep in mind that Doug Herbert runs two cars with Snap-On Tools and
there are a few more Top Fuel players who could double up if necessary.
You don't think "New York Yankee" Top Fuel dragster owners George Steinbrenner
and the Gwynn Family could field two cars if the baseball boss became
a drag race fan. Perish the thought.
Leaving actual racing aside, the well-off teams can test and test often.
They learn a lot from these sessions at an NHRA track and they put the
knowledge to good use at national events. A good single car team can
do that very infrequently at best, further exposing the gap between
rich and poor and diluting the competition.
Don't misunderstand. John Force and Connie Kalitta were not born with
silver spoons in their mouths; they fought for every nickel they ever
earned and deserve their success. The problem, though, is that some
racers, and they are a minority, are better at representing themselves
and their merchandise and consequently move product better than others.
For those that can't, they get the smaller deals and this can translate
itself into a good single-car team that if it got some breaks, could
win an occasional event. That's not encouraging to this viewer.
What'll it be? Five or six two- to three-car teams battling for 16
spots? This is not 1970 as with Mickey Thompson or 1973 when Don Schumacher
ran three Funny Cars. There were double to triple the number of cars
there are now and plenty of action for everybody. The Schumacher/ Wonder
Bread Barracudas (Don, Bobby Rowe, and Raymond Beadle) were positively
lost in the staging lanes at the '73 U.S. Nationals when nearly 50 Funny
Cars tried to qualify for 16 spots. That ain't the case today.
Currently, it appears that there are only realistically six or so nitro
teams that have a shot at winning Top Fuel or Funny Car and that's a
detriment, but I haven't got a clue as to what to do about it. Because
pro drag race fields are smaller than roundy-round fields, straight-line
fans really get drilled by an advertising onslaught from a smaller number
of companies. Let's face it, 2001 could become a 300-mph recruitment
poster for the "be all you can be" crowd. However, that could be a real
ace-in-the-hole for drag racing's future as unappetizing as it is aesthetically.
However, on the flipside, while the sponsors might like the intensity
of exposure their products get, the fans might, MIGHT back off. What
if cynicism set in and remarks like, "Oh wow, another U.S. Army versus
Budweiser final," took hold? Not good. Like soul singer Barry White
said, "Too much of anything, ain't good for 'ya, baby."
I guess the answer lies in some how, some way notching more big sponsorships,
so more racers can match the upped ante that is definitely there. Admittedly,
not much of a response to what could develop into a genuine future problem.
Whadya you guys think?
|